18 July 2008

is you is or is you ain't?

I reaIly need to either start blogging regularly, or just stop "having" a blog.  Apologies to anyone who is still following my feed- I seem to be stuck in some kind of bloggy paralysis.  Part only having knitting to talk about at the moment in what seems to have become a mostly-weaving blog (a stupid reason not to blog, but a real one); part self conscious angst- part just being in a fairly pissy bad mood fairly often.  You know how you start a blog and you're all sweet and nice and "ha ha ha" cute?  And then after a couple of years you're all like "can't keep being sweet and cute, must...swear...must...say...catty...things..."  No?  oh... well, uh, me either.  *shuffles feet*

So, let's change the subject to my knitting.  Then we can get onto the reasons why if you buy a new 3G iPhone in Australia you should avoid Vodafone like the Sydney CBD during Youth Week. (I had to get all the key words out there for Google- to save others from my pain- I'll continue in a minute).

Fibre content:

spinning/spun Mandie's "showgirl" merino tops into a bulky 2 ply to knit a top-down raglan steeked cardi for T.
DSC08501

Here it is, almost  finished:
DSC08502

And I a kitchener away from finishing sock 1 of the "go faster" socks from Yarn mag issue 10.  Just mindless, nothing fancy.
DSC08503


So about my iPhone. (first let me disclaim- if my worst problem in life is iPhone related, I am a Very happy Camper.  That said...grrrr)

On Sunday, I went in to Vodafone to pick up a new 3G iPhone.  Why Vodafone?  Well, I was already with Vodafone- on that "no Plans" thing they had about 5 years ago.  I wanted to keep my number, but I'd need a new plan to take advantage of the 3G goodness of the iPhone.  Ok.  So, I was served by a guy who had been working there for 2 days.  Great.  Nice guy- but freely admitted he had no idea what was going on.  After multiple consultations with the other staff over every aspect of the transaction, various questions, I left with my new plan, and my new phone. 

An hour or so later, I went back to Vodafone- "no signal" just didn't seem right somehow.  Oh, no worries!  Shopboy forgot to do a "SIM swap".  Just put your old SIM back in.  The new plan is in the system, it will catch up with you in a few hours.  I was a bit... unsure by this point.  "ARE YOU SURE?"  I must have asked 50 times and 50 different ways- "yes yes"  they totally blew me off.

Swapped for my old SIM.  No prob, everything worked.

So yesterday- a mere 4 days later, I decide to check my plan... I've signed up for Twitter and wanted to be sure that incoming text messages were free on my plan.  After trying to call Vodafone customer service probably 10 times and after being shoved through a labyrinthine menu system, finally cut off, over and over- I had the bright idea of going online.  Set up "my Vodafone"... checked my plan.  STILL ON  "NO PLANS" and in the last 4 days (and a grand total of about 3 calls and 4 M of data transferred) , billed for (sit down) $140.00!  (Imagine if I hadn't checked and had gone for a whole month!) After I regained consciousness, I tried customer service again several times- no dice.  I then grabbed the kids and went back to the Vodafone store. 

Same guys working as the day I bought my iPhone.  Told them the story, they checked and yep, I was still on "NO PLANS".  The dolt new chap who sold me the phone in the first place called "RETAIL SUPPORT" and was totally blown off by them!  Yep, she's on No Plans.  Nope, it won't change til THE 11 of AUGUST (!!!).  Tough, she has to pay for the calls.  Nope, she has to call Customer Service if she has a problem with that.  GAHHHHHHHH!!! Customer service is utterly inaccessible to me.  The shop idiots were then just "yep, MATE, no worries."  You know when men start calling you Mate that things are not going well.  I retained my cool- just.  There was no point yelling at the retail dudes who were about as powerful as I am.  I went home and called and was cut off by Customer Support (that name is starting to make me giggle) another several times.  I then finally managed to submit a "question" via their web interface... so we shall see.  That's probably best anyway as it's receipted and if I have to go to the Telecomunnications Industry Ombudsman, I will have a log of attempts to resolve THEIR MISTAKE.

Sorry.  Just let me get those terms into Google one more time:

Avoid Vodafone Australia for your 3G iPhone capped plans!

30 June 2008

(one of many) Knitters for Obama raffle prize(s)

The Ravelry group "Knitters for Obama" is holding a fundraising raffle for the Obama campaign, and I have donated this scarf.  You can read more about the way the raffle works here.  Apparently you can buy a ticket for the specific item you'd like to win, which increases your chances of winning greatly.  So you know, if you don't want me to feel embarrassed, buy a ticket for my scarf, huh?

(In case this seems weird or... whatever to anyone, I am an expat citizen of the USA, so it matters to me!)

DSC08167
DSC07958
DSC08196

20 June 2008

Blogstipation

I have something new and purty on the loom, but it's a gift, so I can't blog about that. 
I still have that meme of Abby's to answer, so I can't really do anything else first.  
I have a really cool bag from Jen that I need to show and say "thank you" for, so it would be rude to do anything else before that's done properly with photos and all. 
I have the most gorgeous new necklace that I  got from Etsy seller Industrialfairytale- if you like the steampunk style, you must run, like a bunny rabbit to her shop and check out her wares.  I am gobsmacked by how beautiful and unique my necklace is! But have I taken a pic of it?  nooooo. I really wanted to pimp Sarah's shop because she is just so talented, and nice to boot. 
But I couldn't do that before I did those other things. 
And I wanted to gush about Mandie's latest fibre club because it is brainpoppingly beautiful. And  cuddly- look:
DSC08377

So, I can't blog until I unravel the list of things I want to blog about, right?  Or could I just declare to-do-list bankruptcy and get on with it?  Maybe I'll just do that.

14 June 2008

across the universe

This morning, I had to go to work. 

 Driving the girls to our friends' place to be looked after, T, my 5 year old, out of the blue started asking me questions about John Lennon.  I was transported back in time to my first reading of my favourite work of fiction "A Confederacy of Dunces" by John Kennedy Toole.  If you haven't ever read it, do.  Sadly, I acted out of character in this case for some reason and read the foreword- which let me in on the secret that Toole,  the author, was dead.  Not just dead, but dead from suicide at a really young age.  And dead after writing only two books.  As I read, every laugh, every reflection on the fact that "Confederacy" is one of those rare perfect things was tainted by the sense of loss and sadness that came with the memory that there was no more.  No more published works*, and none to come.  And such a sad, bitter, wasteful death.

So, back to this morning, and a parallel situation evolving:

"so who was the man who made this song mummy?" (she has been, for no apparent reason, belting out 'across the universe' for the last couple of days).

"John Lennon made that song."

"Who was John Lennon?" 

"A peaceful guy, a dad, a poet."

"are you crying?"

"a bit"

"I'm not.  Is he still making songs?"

"no, he's dead."

"why?"

"someone shot him."

"or maybe lightning struck him.  Lightning can be very dangerous".

"uh huh"

"did he have other songs?"

"yes, hundreds."

"about what?"

"all sorts of things.  Lots of songs about love.  Also silly songs about yellow submarines and octopuses gardens"

"does everybody miss him?  everybody in the world?"

"lots of people do..."

(laughs) "did he like to draw giraffes?"

"I think so"

"good, they're my favourite animals".

Lennongiraffe









* there is in fact one other 'the neon bible'.  also brilliant, but not a comedy.

11 June 2008

Small Scarf Virtual Exhibition is almost here!

Meg has done the hard work, and we had the fun of weaving!  The first Small Scarf Virtual Exhibition is almost here!  Please check it out and consider joinng in the fun next time.
SSVE Poster dist

29 May 2008

Book report: Hands on Rigid Heddle Weaving and The Ashford Book of Rigid Heddle Weaving side by side.

The subject of first books for Rigid Heddle weaving seems to arise regularly.  I thought it would be a good idea to have a look at two of the most popular books side by side: Betty Linn Davenport's "Hands on Rigid Heddle Weaving", and Rowena Hart's "Ashford Book of Rigid Heddle Weaving".  I'm not going to talk again about "Creative Weaving", but I have written about it before in some detail.
ABRHW for web

Both "Hands On..." and "the Ashford Book..." seek to introduce the simplicity and portability of rigid heddle weaving to both new weavers, and to experienced weavers who may not be familiar with rigid heddle looms.   "Hands On" presents a table comparing 7 brands of rigid heddle loom and their attributes, side by side.  The Ashford book assumes you have an Ashford loom, but it really doesn't matter, especially if you are in Australia or NZ, where you probably do.  Each has an introduction to the loom and its parts, followed by step by step instructions for warping a rigid heddle loom.

I really wish everyone could have both books.  The Ashford book has lovely, modern projects.  The Davenport book's projects are, admittedly dated and fairly uninspiring.   However, "Hands On" uses these projects to introduce a series of important lessons.  The Ashford book gets you up and weaving too, but could leave you asking a lot of questions later that the Davenport book answers, or worse, not realising that there *are* other questions.  "Hands On" has an extensive bibliography- one glance at it lets the reader know that there *is* more to learn.

"Hands On" was my first Rigid heddle book, and to be completely honest, I never could get my head around the warping method.  In fact, without watching Betty Davenport's dvd (actually I have an ancient VHS version) I don't think I would have ever understood.  I did make a warping board, and stubbornly warped my loom this way a couple of times, but I fudged at points where I lost my way in the instructions.  As soon as I tried the peg method (shown step by step in the Ashford book), I've never looked back, especially since I like laying in different warp yarns spontaneously, as I warp.  That said, the peg method of warping can be seen online- you don't need to buy a book to learn it. 
Horhw

"Hands On" suggests setting up your heddle with marking inches out from the centre (something I'm glad I did, its really handy), and discusses the qualities of special weaving yarns, as well as sett calculations.  This is a sign of things to come- in my opinion, Betty Davenport's book contains a lot more 'meat' than the Ashford book.  Concepts that apply to all weaving are introduced, as is some of the terminology of weaving.  Throughout, "Hands On" treats the subject seriously, assuming that the reader has a certain level of interest in the process of weaving as well as in "how to".



In  section called "Discovering plain weave"  Betty Davenport explains sett in depth, showing a series of samples ranging from weft faced to warp faced, and the use of spaced yarns to make open fabrics, with spaces between the threads.  She explains drafts- a schematic you can use to keep track of your weaving design, on paper.  There is a discussion of the use of different yarns together, and of blending textured yarns and plain yarns.    I hope that if "Hands On" is ever re-released, that the publisher commissions some more exciting examples of the fabrics discussed, because there is a lot of information here, but it's not all that appealingly packaged.

"The Ashford Book"  takes a different approach.  Starting with "experiments in colour", where we are encouraged to weave four scarves, each combining different  proportions of any two colours that you choose, to learn about what can be accomplished with a balanced weave and varying warp and weft colour combinations.  In "Hands On" there are several pages devoted to a serious discussion of  colour theory and a project to weave a colour sampler or gamp to see how different warp and weft colours interact in a balanced weave.  Way more information in "Hands On", nicer projects in "Ashford Book" (although I think the Davenport gamp is really beautiful):
Davgamp

 
Tapestry weaving is sampled  in "the Ashford Book" in a series of 'mug rugs' and a pillow.  The only weft changing method shown is the 'slit' method.  "Hands On" shows a much more comprehensive array of tapestry techniques, and a project to try- a purse to weave (on the left here).  Again, the Ashford projects are probably more eye catching to most people, but the technique taught is limited.
Tapestry

"Fleece rugs" are the project the Ashford Book uses to teach pile weaving.  They're cute and funky.  "Hands On" shows a sampler of a variety of soumak and pile weaves in the 'surface textures' section- a good project or example photo would do wonders for this chapter too- there is loads of information here in 'Hands On' but you have to be ready to look for it to want to use it, as presented. 

"Textured cushions" (Ashford)  introduces the idea of adding unspun fibre as a weft accent in an otherwise plain weave- a very nice project.  "Hands On" has several variations of inlay and supplementary weft set out.  I wonder whether in the 1980s, when Betty Davenport was working on her CoE, she was still avoiding  anything that reminded her of '70s craft- and the unspun fibre thing kind of does remind me of some of the wacky craft project books I have from the '70s.  "Hands On" has inlay projects with silk thread- the project is not memorable, but the content of the chapter are solid and well explained.  Ashford: one technique, fun project.  Davenport: many techniques, naff project (that's not really fair- the transparency inlay that is given in "Hands On" as a project is something I really want to try, I just don't love the example in the book).

"Hands On" has several garments as projects.  Blouses and tabards, and vests  as well as scarfs and wraps.  The facts of loom-shaped garment design are given in detail.  Unfortunately the garments are all rather dated, and one would have to have more fashion-vision than I do to redesign them for 2008.  The Ashford Book has a drapey cloak as a large project- teaching the joining of widths of fabric, assembly of a garment and a bit of freeform weaving as an accent.  You'd learn more from making the Davenport garments, but you'd possibly wear the Ashford project (if you are in NZ.  And you are elvish).

A set of shibori placemats in The Ashford book have no comparable project in "Hands On", I think.  Thinking "what on earth has shibori to do with weaving" a moment ago- I'm now interested to see that the thread pulled to make the shibori 'puckers' is actually a weft float.  Cool- is all woven shibori done like that?  I always assumed that the pleats were stitched in later, after weaving. 

The Ashford Book has a short chapter on weaving with silk, and a chapter on weaving with materials other than yarn,such as fabric strips, sticks, hemp, paper yarn, etc.

A set of really lovely blue and white cotton and linen towels sample several different weave patterns in the Ashford Book.  In "Hands On" there are also several pages and samplers devoted to different colour and weave effects, more complex and thorough than those in the Ashford Book.  Once more, there is a more serious and in-depth study of colour-and-weave in "Hands On", but the project in the Ashford book makes you want to weave it.  My compromise would be to weave the "Hands On" samplers in crisp white and blue cotton and linen, to have the best of both worlds!

Davenport sampler and draft on the left, Ashford towels on the right:
Colorandpattern
 
Finally my favourite project in "The Ashford Book", and the one which makes it worth the price of admission, even if you use nothing else from it- leno lace.  "Hands On" sets out instructions for several varieties on hand-controlled weaves- not just leno.  Betty Davenport teaches here exclusively the method of using a pick-up stick to create these weaves. 
Ashfordleno
The Ashford Book only goes into leno, and teaches a method involving making a string heddle, and using it to create the two sheds needed.  Both methods work- I found the string heddle method faster, but now I am wondering if I created the pick-up stick shed in the wrong place when I tried it months ago!  If you like the look of lacy weaves, though, again, "Hands On" provides more than one you can try, even if the linen sampler shown doesn't inflame your imagination.











For the purposes of this comparison, I have gone through the Ashford book and looked for the equivalent chapter in "Hands On".  There are also sections in "Hands On" that, while mentioned briefly in "the Ashford Book", go into detail that the Ashford Book does not.  A full section in "Hands On" on ways to treat fringes, join pieces of handwoven fabric and fabric finishing are examples of this.

The books both are commonly mentioned in the same breath as "the" learn to weave (on a rigid heddle loom) options.  The major differences between the two books stem superficially from their relative years of publication, but more significantly from their different purposes. 

"Hands On" (and "Colors and Textures for the Rigid Heddle Loom", her next book) were published as a result of Betty Linn Davenport's research into the capabilities of the Rigid Heddle Loom for the Handweavers' Certificate of Excellence (CoE).  It is more than a fun introduction, but a serious work.  For those who complain that others think their rigid heddle loom is a toy, or for those who are serious about finding out "what can you do with this loom?", this is the book you need.  

The "Ashford Book of Rigid Heddle Weaving" is a book with the ultimate purpose of promoting the use of rigid heddle looms by new generations of fibre lovers- of converting knitters and spinners into weavers.  It is great for its purpose.  Once a new weaver is hooked, s/he will no doubt go on to explore other more in-depth publications. 

Finally, here is a summary of what I personally see as the pros and cons of each:

Ashford Book:
Pros- direct warping method; colourful, inspiring projects; string heddle leno project

Cons: narrower range of techniques offered; less general weaving theory, no bibliography.

Hands on Rigid Heddle Weaving:
Pros: comprehensive section on plain weave; several hand manipulated weaves; colour and pattern drafts explained; sett explained and its application; several tapestry techniques; colour theory discussed; excellent bibliography.

Cons: direct warping not covered; projects and styling dated and uninspiring.

Myself, I think we all need both books! 

Also please note that the Ashford site  says that "the Ashford Book of Rigid heddle Weaving" is about to be re-released in a new revision, July 2008.  So it might be worth waiting til then to get it.

28 May 2008

FO!

Look what I made!
Babyriley3

ha!  Gotcha.  I did make it (him, actually)... only it was 15 years ago, exactly.  I remember when they brought him to me (yes, hospital birth, you live and you learn, sorry kiddo) I was prepared for a red wrinkly ugly critter- and he seemed SO BEAUTIFUL.  I remember saying "is that MINE?" (if not, why was my (X)H carrying him?  I blame morphine).

Of course a 15 year old is by no means a FO.  However, it *is* a person who, having finished 14 trips around the sun, has completed certain milestones.  I remember another blogger talking about this once, and I agreed with her thoughts.  My 15 year old will never be a 14 year old school dropout.  He will not be a man who has *never* had a girlfriend.  Or a 14 year old father.  That kind of thing.  Certain boxes are tickable, and I intend to tick them.  Its the only reward we get as parents, many days!

So, after coming to me in the dark, wrapped in a flannel blanket and already bathed (sorry, kiddo) and wide eyed, he grew and he grew.

Babyriley

Isn't it funny that in the days BEFORE digital cameras, I took hundreds of photos of my first baby, and somehow had them ALL developed eventually, even though we were so poor in those days that finding a $2 coin on the footpath was like a lottery win. My third baby, in a thoroughly digital home, has probably 1/3 the photos of her babyhood. Sorry kiddo. I've always loved the pic above, in my dad's arms- R. has always been R.- and you can see that in his face in this picture. "get me out of this useless baby body! I have stuff to do! It's an outrage!".

He kept growing, and went through his dinosaur stage (and his black eye stage, apparently). The rubber gloves transformed him into a velociraptor. (see in the background how I had plastic outdoor chairs at my dining table?  See above statement about finding $2 coin- things hadn't changed much)


Babyriley2



He kept growing.

DSC00399 





I got tired of scanning photos, so I skipped forward to what must be 2002, because that is a baby sister he is holding, and I had a digital camera!.  Obviously things change. 


100_0412 













R was 10 in this picture.  This was about the age where he asked me to PLEASE let him sign up for some kind of team ball sport, because he couldn't catch and got picked last in games.  SORRY KIDDO.  Of course, I did.  Out of all the cool things about this kid, the thing I admire the most is that while he is
Dsc00795 gifted with his own share of smarts and ability- he has not been a prodigy at... well anything- not in the sense that he picked it up and was instantly good at it.  Whether it was piano, karate (sorry, done with scanning), basketball (too dark in the stadium to have many good pics) or AFL, he started off fairly- ordinary?  And stuck. with, it.  And now he is very good at all those things.  Well,not karate, he kind of lost interest in that after 3 years or so.  But you see my point.  I really, really admire that in him.

So, he just kept growing.  Made the cut for selective primary school in year 4 and 5.  Subsequently made the cut for selective high school.  I was so proud!  Can you tell? :-).









Oh look, I found one basketball one- he would have been 12? here.. 2004, no, 11.  Under 12's I guess.
DSC02346















Look at this one- what a sweet brother.  What is blowing my mind a little as I type this is how young he looks, and yet how grown up I know he was at the time this photo was taken.
DSC02414















The 2005 AFL grand final (ok, under 12s AFL grand final ;-) ).
P9100017




















At dinner after our wedding in 2006 (mine and his step-dad's that is!). 
DSC03984















Holding baby sis #2 in Sept 2006.

DSC04770















2007 om nom nom nom.
DSC05896















2008! proudly showing the first money he ever earned (not from me), umpiring AFL:
DSC08256_2




















As I always tell people, I have had so little to do with this kid becoming what he is becoming- "he was like that when he got here" I say.  I am so honoured to have been invited on the journey though.  Happy Birthday, Buh*!


*when you have baby sisters, you get nicknames like "buh".

26 May 2008

the evangelical crafter

I have a small weaving FO, and a new knitting project started, and Abby tagged me for another meme, although she assures me it's nothing personal. 

Sophie

But. 

First I want to muse on what seems to be the commonly held belief that to enjoy a craft is to want to spread it like a virus amongst all ones acquaintance.  It even seems to be everyone's sacred  responsibility to do so.  Surely I'm not the only person who simply doesn't care if anyone else in my circle wants to learn to knit/spin/weave/crochet/sew?  I do understand that up to a point it's up to us to ensure that crafts do not die out and that skills are not lost, and suppliers don't go out of business.  I understand that if everyone was as apathetic as I am, they would probably become extinct.  I'd also be more than happy to teach anyone who asked me how, to do anything I can do myself. 

But...

 I don't know, I just don't have that fever of desire to show others the way.   Maybe I enjoy gritting my teeth in irritation every time a friend (or stranger!) comments: "Oh, I wish I had time to do that!".  I know that's an opportunity to make a scathing or humourous point about how it's productive fidgeting or something, cheaper than therapy, better than prozac, but I find myself just smiling (and thinking 'yeah, well why dontcha go and BEEEEP your BEEEPBEEEEEEEEEEP') as I click click click away.  When people with hobbies or interests that I do not understand laugh at mine, I refrain from any attempt at witty or logically defensive comeback- I guess I feel that if you can be that hypocritical, it's not like I'm going to change your mind.  Not even like I want to.

Now, when non-knitters (the only fibre craft I pursue in public is knitting, for portability reasons) make their comments, I basically just think "you're from omicron persei 7, 'm from omicron persei 8, whatever" and go on with my day.  But what really amazes me (doesn't piss me off- because I would have to care,and I do not) is the intra-craft bitchiness* (I also don't assume there's any reason we should like one another because we both like yarn, but I digress).  "Rigid heddle looms are not real looms".  "Weaving on a computerised dobby loom is not real weaving".  THESE STATEMENTS have  BOTH REALLY been made to (two different) people I know.  Hello?  A simple loom isn't a loom?  A complex, high tech loom isn't a real loom?  To me, those prejudices cancel out and I am back where I started- I love my simple loom.  I love that (to me) it is Real Weaving, palaeo weaving (ok, I know ancient weavers didn't have rigid heddle looms like mine).  You put the weft in there, one row at a time.  You push it down with a stick. You get cloth.  You can make fancier cloth by messing with the warp, by messing with the weft.  You can use it for tablet weaving.  You can use it for tapestry weaving.  I have taken the heddle out altogether and used it to control an unruly warp, when the warp yarn was too wildly textured to pass through even my 5 dpi reed.  I really like my rigid heddle loom.  I do get floor loom envy- it would be nice to not have to put down the shuttle to beat every shot (shut up Mandie).  But I really, REALLY like plain weave. 

It's interesting that there are lots of rigid heddle weavers' groups online.  I feel like rigid heddle weaving uses a subset of the things that weavers on more complex looms need to know.  I always like to read posts on the generic "weaving" lists, because there is such a broad range of experience there, some of which is also applicable to my simple loom.  Sometimes I feel that being in a special group for rigid heddle weavers keeps us (RH weavers) from sharing in the weaving knowledge of the bigger weaving community.  Some of whom appreciate a RH loom for the nifty tool it is, others who do not.   Just some thoughts.  Remember that it really doesn't take anything away from you if someone else thinks your loom is a toy**.

Here is a list of some of the weaving lists I am on:

Weaving (@ yahoogroups.com)- a big list with weavers of all types. Awesomely helpful IME and welcoming to sensible questions/input from RH weavers.

WeavingSalesAds (@ yahoogrops.com)- I love to read this one to see all the fab looms I could buy if I lived in the continental USA :-).

Anzweavespin @yahoogroups.com- eh.  Low volume, Aus and NZ specific.  haven't felt the love.

rhlooms @yahoogroups.com - I just joined this one, somehow I missed it when searching for "weaving" groups on yahoo ages ago.  Seems like a very nice bunch so far.  Rigid Heddle specific.

Rigid heddle Weavers @ Ravelry nice group of RH weavers on Ravelry.

Warped Weavers @ ravelry nice bunch of weavers of all stripes, including RH, on Ravelry.



* Not to even get into the wars between the "thinnest, brownest thread club" spinners vs the "art yarn" spinners.  Oh please.

** Not that I have ever heard this first hand!

17 May 2008

leno, and me

For ages I have been staring, awestruck, at Jackie's *stunning* woven leno shawl (that's a link to Ravelry).  Isn't it just perfect?  There's something about the play of colour against the simple, open weave that makes me weak at the knees.  (Here it is- photo used with permission-this is Jackie's leno wrap):

Cranesleno


The personification of generosity, Jackie has been encouraging me for an even equally long time to give it a go myself.  Finally tonight was the night, and I had my first noncatastrophic leno experience.  My scarf has dodgie tension and bad selvedges and is not even in the same league as the one that inspired me to keep trying with the leno- but I did manage it, and I can see how it works now.   THANKS JACKIE.   Here is my little leno scarf:

Dsc08260


















Dsc08264

My previous dabbing at leno was via pick up stick, and it truly drove me to the edge of madness. 
 
Jackie encouraged me to try the string heddle method expounded in the Ashford Book of Rigid Heddle Weaving (although in truth I followed the instructions in Jean Wilson's "Weaving is Creative" (1974)- a book which I MUST tell you about.  The string heddle thing works a treat- you were right.  The tangled mass of cotton warp yarn you see there is actually my string heddle.  It seemed like a better photo when I took it.  heh heh.  The string heddle makes weaving this actually faster than normal plain weave- because you don't have to mess with the rigid heddle inbetwixt shots (shut up Mandie ;-)).


PS- edited to add:

I am not athousandcranes @ ravelry.  Jackie is.  The beautiul leno wrap is Jackie's, aka athousandcranes.  My leno scarf/sampler thingie is the purple and blue one.  Just wanted to be sure I was clear!

14 May 2008

there is no woodcutter in my version of the story.

subtitle: a wolf ate my small scarf.

The story of Red Riding Hood has always disturbed me.  Sometimes I almost forget about it, but then like a pebble in my shoe, in time it works its way round to a tender part where it rubs and hurts and irritates me.  Lately, it's been back, burning a hole in my brain.  That sweet little girl, betrayed by not one but *two* female family members.  Maybe it's because I have a 5 year old now, but the very idea of sending her into the *woods*... ugh.  And why is that sick  old lady living alone in the forest?  Why isn't her daughter looking after her?  Did filial responsibility skip a generation in this family?

Dsc08231

Until I retell this story, it only exists for me out there in the familiar form, to make me sad every time I think about it.  Whenever it gets back under my skin, I lay awake at night thinking about her.  Don't send her.  Don't go.




 


Wolves, to me, always stand for the bone-warping forces of physical transformation to which we are all prey.  Part of the life cycle, part of us, feared but essential.  Puberty, to me, is the werewolf, transforming cuddly human puppies into bony, bleeding, snarling monsters- suddenly subject to the irresistable commands of the moon,  the inner tides.  Menarche, pregnancy, birth.  Have you ever felt your bones move out of the way as a new baby enters the outside world?  These are powerful forces.  Ever felt someone was threatening your baby?  Motherhood is a wild and scary place.  Menopause, croning.  The thinning, the bending the drying, the greying.  Once the wolf drops us from her jaws, we are nothing like the creature who entered the dark wood  with her basket of goodies as a little girl.  Not physically, not in any other way.

Dsc08230

In my story, Red Riding Hood and the wolf stalk one another through the dark forest.  The wolf consumes grandma, and when Red Riding Hood is herself willingly consumed, the wolf becomes her chrysalys.  There is no woodcutter in my story.

When she is ripe, Red Riding Hood bursts from her wolfish cocoon.  She is powerful,  magical, terrifying, a being at the height of her powers, an adult woman.

Dsc08226  

Does she ever go back to her mother's house?  Does she send her daughter into the wood alone, when her time comes?  Do any of us get any choice in that?

Happy belated Mothers Day, women.

Bits and Pieces